Faith
So today is Easter, and as
such we are subjected to an onslaught of news stories from two camps. The first group starts out with the headline
"10 Facts that Prove Jesus Never Existed." The second group's headlines claim
"Evidence of Jesus' Life Found."
Both sets of headlines are
complete bullshit. Further, both sides
completely miss the point.
However, before I address
that story, I need to address the issue of mythologization and how it relates
to the Jesus Myth. I also want to point
out here the actual meaning of "Myth," which means a story that
reveals a Truth, regardless of whether it is actually factual. In no way am I insulting Christianity by
claiming it to be a mythology. ALL
religions are mythologies because they reveal Truth, and define the method by
which Man is connected to Man, Man to Himself, and Man to God.
Basically the process of
Mythologization, when it relates to an actual person goes through several
stages: heroism, villianization, propaganda tool, legend and finally myth.
(If you want a more complete description of these stages, please read my
blog post "The Deconstruction of Falling Stars.") I will briefly outline it here before
proceeding. Great and important people
start out as heroes, then typically at some point, often during their lives,
but also sometimes after their death.
This is an attempt to kill their message. This villianization often leads them to then
become a propaganda tool, either in a positive or a negative manner.
This propaganda begins to
detach the real person from their message and their ideology. It can be used negatively to become a symbol
of despite, or it can be used positively, as a paradigm to illustrate. In either case, the person's actual message
gets twisted to fit a very specific end.
After propaganda comes
legend, when the actual person is subsumed by the propaganda. The individual is no longer even able to be
separated from the story. Further, their
name becomes a metaphor for an entire concept.
Think of what the name Robin Hood evokes; it creates very specific
concept for anyone who knows the legend..
At this stage, we know a story about the person, but we have very few
facts.
The final stage is
mythologization, where the person becomes symbolic of not just an idea, but an
entire ideology. At this stage, all
facts are lost, not because they are forgotten, but because they are no longer
important. Hence the fact that the
Gospels all tell a different story about the life of Jesus. It does not matter that they can't be
reconciled, because the facts are utterly unimportant. What has become the prime mover is the
concepts and the ideas that found the myth.
Which now brings me to the
point of this post. The actual fact of
Jesus does not matter.
I know this sounds radical,
and probably offensive to many people, but let me explain. Faith is either obliterated or strengthened
by fact, but not in the way that people expect.
In fact, proof that Jesus never lived will do nothing but strengthen the
faith of Christians. Similarly, proof
that Jesus lived will kill the religion, because of the actual nature of faith.
So first, let's look at the
"Jesus Was Not Real" side.
Many people on the atheist side believe very strongly that they can kill
Christianity by proving that there was no actual Jesus, and he was created out
of whole cloth by a bunch of first century writers. Their point is, "if it can be proven
that Christianity is founded on a falsehood, essentially a 2000 year old lie,
that it will rapidly fall apart.
Before I address why this
view is incorrect, I will grant that they have a number of strong facts in
their favor. There is no actual historic
record of Jesus in the way that we have of Muhammad. You would think for all of his revolutionary
preaching, he would have been at least mentioned in Roman records, or possibly
in Greek or Egyptian accounts of the region.
Even if he isn't named, it stands to reason that such a charismatic
person would have drawn the attention of someone outside of Judea .
Add to this all of the
contradictions found in the Bible, and the fact that, when you read the Gospels
and Paul chronologically, the story of the Life of Jesus becomes increasingly
elaborate and fantastic. And just to
state, the actual order chronologically is: all of Paul, in the 50's; Mark, in
the 60's; Matthew, in the 70's; Luke, no earlier than the 80's and possibly as
late as 110; and John, written between 90's and 150. The conflicts and contradictions show that
much of the Bible was written legend and story, not first hand accounts.
However, in the interest of
fairness, there are some rebuttals to these points. First, it was not a mass media world, and
very few people wrote anything. What was
written and preserved was generally the most important things. A rebellious leader of a small sect in an
very troublesome province of the Empire probably wouldn't warrant a lot of
accounts. For all we know, the Governor
of Judea sent weekly reports to the Emperor that have been lost to time. The Romans would not have had any reverence
for Jesus, and would not have seen any reason to preserve any missives about
him.
Also, the conflicts in the
Books of the Bible are also not any sort of proof, as almost all serious
Biblical Scholars recognize this, and do not feel that there is any sort of a
problem with the facts not aligning.
They understand that the New Testament was written many years after
Jesus, by a number of different authors, and for very different political and
religious purposes.
For example, Matthew was
written for a congregation mixed between Jews and Gentiles, and therefore
Matthew 20:9 "And when they came that were hired about the eleventh hour
they received every man a denarius..." refers to the dissention of how
could people who were not Jewish and came to Jesus late should receive the same
heavenly reward.
Now to return to the point,
that if the atheists can prove there was no Jesus, it will kill the religion,
and by extension, destroy the idea of religiosity. This actually is not how the brain
works. First of all, neuroscientists are
discovering that faith and belief is hardwired into the human brain. In other words, even if by some chance we
destroyed Christianity, another faith would spring up to take its place.
But beyond that, there is
another quirk in the human psyche. If
you attack a person's deeply held belief, you don't kill it, you actually make
it stronger. It is essentially a human
reflex, and the more the belief is attacked, the more intransigent it
becomes.
An interesting aside to this
is a study done a number of years ago with medical students. The devoutly religious students counted
different numbers of ribs for men and women, and no matter how many times it
was tried to prove to them that there is actually no difference, they could not
count the same number of ribs on male and female skeletons. The more the researchers pushed, the more
angry and distraught the religious students became.
So, in the end, the more
that people try to disprove the existence of a historical Jesus, the stronger
the belief in Him becomes for the Faithful.
This leads to the other
situation where Biblical Archeologists work very hard to prove the actual
existence of the "real" Jesus.
They discover Ossuaries, uncover buildings and other artifacts or proofs
of Jesus.
However, these actions are
completely antithetical to faith.
Faith is founded in a belief
that transcends facts. In fact, faith is
destroyed by proof, because once there is proof, faith becomes fact. Further, once something becomes fact, all of
the mystery and discussion dies. There
might still be respect and reverence, but something essential has left the
picture.
It illustrate this, lets
examine how kings and queens are treated.
Queen Elizabeth is a fact. We know she is real, that she exists outside
of the stories about her in books and papers.
Many people revere the Queen, they respect her and consider her a symbol
for everything British. But that is
where it ends. They do not worship her,
and if they invoke her in prayer, it is to ask for her to be blessed, not to
ask for Her blessing.
And this goes further
back. I am not trying to offend anyone,
but Muhammad was an actual historical figure.
There are many accounts of his life written contemporaneously with his
time on this planet. There are also many
legends that were later attributed to him, but he is a unique religious figure
(in the West at least) in that there are many known facts about him.
Now, while the Muslims
revere him, and hold him in the highest esteem, they do not actually pray to
him. (And you question this, or think I am being
offensive, please read this Salafi webpage on this) The Muslims worship only Allah, and recognize
that Muhammad was a man and a prophet.
And on a side note, they believe that Jesus was also a prophet, not
himself Divine. Further, this was a
belief held by many Gnostic Sects, and a number of early Christian communities.
But the point is, it is all
but impossible to worship fact. You can
revere it, and hold it in the highest esteem, but when a person becomes fact,
their nature fundamentally changes. If
Jesus were proven to be fact, much of the text of the New Testament would come
into question, especially the miracles and other direct manifestations of God's
power through His Son.
If he was proven to be a
real person, and, for example, his bones recovered, the Resurrection would
become, in the best case, metaphor. In
the worst case, it would become a grand Santa Claus lie in many peoples' eyes. In any case, the underpinning of faith that
is the necessary foundation of religion and myth would be undermined.
Because of this, the
conversation of whether Jesus was actually "real" not is
irrelevant. Jesus transcends fact. The truth is that the religion founded in His
name completely altered the course of the ancient world, and has been a
positive influence in the lives of many for almost 2000 years. It has also been the cause of many deaths and
much horror. The actual facts of His
life are not really important, no more than they are in any myth. The myth IS the meaning.
But in the end, if the
Atheists want to kill Christianity, they should be trying to prove that Jesus
was real, and if the Christians want to make their faith even stronger, they
should be trying to prove Jesus never was an actual person.
And that is yet another
perfect irony.
No comments:
Post a Comment